I like the combination of analysts and moles giving early warning to purchasers of IT hardware.
The cloak 'and' the dagger please.
So, same processor power, same power comsumption... #
By NostromoPosted Wednesday 10th June 2009 11:51 GMT
... I must be missing something. I want my passively cooled, moderately capable PC and I want it now!. Can you hear me Mr. Intel, away with fans on chipsets.
By Ryan BarrettPosted Wednesday 10th June 2009 12:03 GMT
With an integrated graphics and io controller I assume that the power draw of the entire system will drop a fair bit?
IIRC the current generation of netbooks draw around 25-30w, mainly thanks to the chipset. If this eliminates the need for the big drinkers in the chipset, could this lead to an entire-system figure closer to 15-20w?
By Chippy-MintonPosted Wednesday 10th June 2009 12:25 GMT
"The CPU consumes no more than 7W - 1W less than the N280."
and up to 20W or so less than the ancient 945 chipsets the atom cpu is lumbered with. This is more or less current atom with low power integrated chipset on board - that was the headline you missed.
Comments on: Next-gen Atom to launch in October, say moles
Good work #
By A B 3 Posted Wednesday 10th June 2009 11:31 GMT
So, same processor power, same power comsumption... #
By Nostromo Posted Wednesday 10th June 2009 11:51 GMT
Power draw from the whole system? #
By Ryan Barrett Posted Wednesday 10th June 2009 12:03 GMT
Chipset power #
By Chippy-Minton Posted Wednesday 10th June 2009 12:25 GMT