"But, gladly, he didn’t drop any hints about Porsche attempting to overcome these issues by developing its own leccy spotscar because it realises that introducing money to a drain is a stupid idea."
By Hugh JorgenPosted Thursday 2nd July 2009 12:13 GMT
Typical, they went for a 911. The 924 was far more aerodynamic, and has almost complete balance on each quarter, even the 944 and 968 would have been a better choice for the same reasons.
Perhaps it's because the Porsche fraternity can't get it up without a 911, never mind the mechanical brilliance of the other models, if it doesn't look like a clapped out old beetle they don't want to know.
Paris....because I fancy a blowjob in the back of my vectra.
So - the Porsche guy rubbishes the competition but has some praise for the Porsche restorers who have turned their hand to making an electric Porsche. Surely, that's what one might expect from a Porsche spokesman?
Given that the German government has given a big "Nein" to Porsche's request for an enormous government loan, it is hardly surprising they aren't promising much in the way of whacky new technology. They'll be chuffed if they don't end up as part of Fiat or owned by some Russian oligarch.
By Frank BoughPosted Thursday 2nd July 2009 12:56 GMT
The basic facts are these:- electric motor >2x efficiency of IC motor; liquid HC fuel approx 10x energy capacity of batteries.
Now, simple arithmetic will show that it IS possible to create a battery electric vehicle of whatever type you like, but you will need to design and package it differently to an IC vehicle achieve best results.
It's not rocket science - look at the Tesla, it works and it's based on a repurposed IC chassis design. Imagine what might be a done with a clean sheet effort.
"Dürheimer hinted that the leccy car industry still faces several key challenges, including the creation of decent charging systems, and the development of smaller and lighter batteries."
Well, duh. Obstacles? You don't say? Wow, we better cancel the whole thing, then. It's a good thing Henry Ford and others didn't proceed with the silly notion of non-horse, non-steam propulsion when they ran into obstacles. Oh, wait, that's right, they didn't stop, they continued, overcoming the obstacles. And now Porsche is a multi-billion dollar company because of that determination.
You're not getting the point of a "technological demonstration" are you? Yes the company may fancy the idea of selling conversions but that isn't set in stone and what they are showing is simply that they can and they chose a model everyone will recognize. It's called good marketing you might want to look that up sometime. Nor does Ruff desiring to get into the electric conversion business and using a 911 as an example preclude it from converting any model Porsche it desires.
So far as you examples go, I'll give you the 944 and maybe a 968 as a good option. But a 924?? Why not just go to the bottom of the shit list of Porsche models and say the 914. BTW yes I've driven all the above models and yes the 911 is still top of the mark. There is a reason you can buy two or three 924's for the same price as a 911 in the same model year.
A complete bargain, all the city types will be falling over themselves to get this.....
yeah right!
The idea of a sports car is to go fast and look good [to hide the fact you are very dull in reality].
Isn't the "hey look at me" as you scream past the hordes of devout Christians and horse box towers on the country roads dependant on the car making a noise?
I think if you can afford £160k for a battery car you can also afford the same model in petrol too. + the petrol.....
Comments on: Porsche bites back at e-car proponents
Let's see now... #
By Peter Richardson Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 11:28 GMT
I corrected it for you #
By AC 4 Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 11:59 GMT
Wrong car entirely. #
By Hugh Jorgen Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 12:13 GMT
Surprise? #
By JohnG Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 12:14 GMT
This... #
By David W. Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 12:51 GMT
Sad, and Porsche has Hybrids on the way #
By Frank Bough Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 12:56 GMT
Ruf are NOT after-market tuners #
By RFC822 Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 13:19 GMT
@RFC822 #
By JP Strauss Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 13:50 GMT
So like, you can buy 2 petrol powered cars #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 14:48 GMT
108 years later, same problems... #
By Dennis O'Connor Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 15:25 GMT
Obstacles? Really? #
By Chris C Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 21:04 GMT
@wrong car entirely #
By Iam Me Posted Thursday 2nd July 2009 22:10 GMT
Porsche sour grapes #
By adrian sietsma Posted Friday 3rd July 2009 01:48 GMT
£160k for a battery car? #
By Andy 97 Posted Friday 3rd July 2009 07:53 GMT
@adrian sietsma #
By JP Strauss Posted Friday 3rd July 2009 08:34 GMT
500lbs heavier!? #
By DRendar Posted Friday 3rd July 2009 13:14 GMT