By Mike RichardsPosted Thursday 9th July 2009 19:55 GMT
All those big rounded corners and bright colours had me hoping they'd designed a neoprene or silicone covered netbook that could take a tumble. A ruggedised model would go towards justifying that price.
But as J 3 says above, wake me up when there's something new...
...you know radical stuff like higher resolutions or more than 1Gb RAM, or a browser that thinks it's an operating system ;)
By NogginTheNogPosted Thursday 9th July 2009 21:39 GMT
Apart from a few honourable exceptions, the quick break for freedom and revolution when the first netbooks appeared has been all but stomped out by the jackboot of monopoly (not sure whether it's Intel's or Microsoft's - or both?!), restricting the hardware specs to pretty much identikit machinery...
...this newest incarnation consequently underperforms its siblings and still is more expensive. Just shows us again that the best means of making money is playing on the fact that people are stupid.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 10th July 2009 09:01 GMT
I have an NC10 which cost £300 that really is the limit on price for a netbook anything more and you're into notebook territory. Granted you won't be running a great hulking celeron with poor battery life but it's still too much.
By Jason BloombergPosted Friday 10th July 2009 09:23 GMT
A NetBook was a cheap, lightweight 'laptop' which could do enough to keep you happy when about town or on public transport. They sure had limitations but they were compensated for by cheapness and weight. And, TBH, they were not as under-powered as they seemed when compared to what we were using as desktop PC's a decade ago.
Then the potential user's who "didn't get it" started moaning that it didn't run Windows Vista, had no 7-core processor, hadn't got 4GB of Ram nor a 1TB disk drive and wouldn't allow them to edit their DVD's in real time while rendering fractals and streaming HD video. Well d'uh !
Sadly, the manufacturers saw a market for a NetBook-Plus, with bumped-up capabilities and attached a well bumped-up price tag, and left those who "did get it" out in the cold while they pandered to the 'Laptop with NetBook name tag' market. After all, there's more money to be made, and it seems everyone has jumped ship and true NetBooks are now long gone.
To me - and I suspect many more - price was the key element of a NetBook. I am sure there is still a market there. It's a shame that it's not being supplied. I guess the "maximise profit" motive will ensure that continues. After all, profit comes above satisfying needs.
Wake me up when the sub-£150 NetBook is back on sale. I can buy any £300+ Laptop anywhere.
Granted it is the previous model with the 8.9" screen, but Expansys have the Aspire One A150 on at the moment for one of your new pennies under that £150 mark. OK it is another 6 quid for delivery but still...
By david batesPosted Friday 10th July 2009 20:23 GMT
Absolutely - my eee701 does'nt run Vista, or paintshop, and it won't edit videos.
It is, however, cheap, rugged, very portable, surfs beautifully and handles gentle office tasks.
The netbook must be one of the best, shortest lived niches in history - its gone from a brand new concept to boring notebook alsoran in what? 18 months? :(
By Joel MansfordPosted Wednesday 15th July 2009 18:35 GMT
I had been pining over a Dell Mini 10v, mostly for the 1366x768 screen, but then I added the better CPU, bluetooth, and before I new it I was close to Samsung money.
Then an email arrived from eBuyer for an Aspire A150 for under £150 all in. I installed my MSDN XP Pro on it and I've not looked back. As others have mentioned the spec is completely adequate (1.6Ghz/1Gb/120Gb).
I needed the harddrive to install the apps I use and also to card music + video about. I completely accept the battery hit. I just wish it could boot off of one of the SD slots so I could fall back to Linux to squeeze that life back. Oh and built in 3G would be nice...
Comments on: Samsung N310 netbook
Nice... #
By Si 1 Posted Thursday 9th July 2009 17:47 GMT
Yawn... #
By J 3 Posted Thursday 9th July 2009 18:38 GMT
Oh and I thought it was going to be bouncy #
By Mike Richards Posted Thursday 9th July 2009 19:55 GMT
vista? #
By mikeyt Posted Thursday 9th July 2009 20:41 GMT
Ditto with the yawns #
By NogginTheNog Posted Thursday 9th July 2009 21:39 GMT
Not a netbook. #
By Gene Cash Posted Thursday 9th July 2009 22:24 GMT
330 + ION + N #
By bluest.one Posted Thursday 9th July 2009 22:40 GMT
Recommendation all future "Netbook" reviews #
By Goat Jam Posted Friday 10th July 2009 05:09 GMT
Am I the only one then? #
By TeeCee Posted Friday 10th July 2009 07:47 GMT
I love how... #
By Bytus Posted Friday 10th July 2009 08:09 GMT
Too many £££££££££££££££ #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 10th July 2009 09:01 GMT
In the good old days ... #
By Jason Bloomberg Posted Friday 10th July 2009 09:23 GMT
@ Jason Bloomberg - Sub £150 NetBook #
By Rasczak Posted Friday 10th July 2009 14:54 GMT
@Jason Bloomberg #
By david bates Posted Friday 10th July 2009 20:23 GMT
Just got an A150 for £149.99 inc VAT +delivery #
By Joel Mansford Posted Wednesday 15th July 2009 18:35 GMT
Samsung has serious Apple envy... #
By Joe 3 Posted Tuesday 21st July 2009 00:29 GMT