By TheTickPosted Tuesday 18th August 2009 12:25 GMT
You did not see the BIOS password bug because Intel stopped distribution of these drives when they found the bug, and only sent the drives back out after they had their firmware updated.
By Leo WaldockPosted Tuesday 18th August 2009 14:37 GMT
To the best of my knowledge Intel hasn't said that a particular firmware version is cursed by the bug however I can state that the drive I reviewed came with firmware 2CV102G2 and the bug fix version is 2CV102G9.
By Bronek KozickiPosted Tuesday 18th August 2009 22:16 GMT
... ordered a week ago, still waiting. Not in stock!
And I agree, one of the most important figures for system disk is random small write. Old HD-tach charts (continuous read and write) are almost irrelevant for SSD 1. technology is fast enough most of the time anyway 2. they do not catch "stuttering" problem.
By John RobsonPosted Wednesday 19th August 2009 12:53 GMT
4k Random IO is the most important IO you do on most machines.
The MAXIMUM, not average latency of these operations is critical - remember the original non intel drives? Really fast, then stalled for a second, then really fast...
That seriously illustrated that the relevant benchmarks are not throughput for almost anyone...
Comments on: Intel X25-M 34nm Flash SSD
BIOS bug #
By TheTick Posted Tuesday 18th August 2009 12:25 GMT
BIOS issues #
By Leo Waldock Posted Tuesday 18th August 2009 14:37 GMT
Getting close... #
By Annihilator Posted Tuesday 18th August 2009 15:40 GMT
Random IO #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 18th August 2009 15:58 GMT
wait ... #
By Bronek Kozicki Posted Tuesday 18th August 2009 22:16 GMT
Max latency? #
By John Robson Posted Wednesday 19th August 2009 12:53 GMT