On so many grounds: no

1: Windows... the last thing I want is for my head to crash.

2: The display... it looks like they've used a CRT for the display... why does it need such a big block?

3: Looks... you're not exactly going to go out wearing one looking like that, are you?

4: Functionality.... They haven't announced compatibility with any flying cars - just think how impressive it would be to control your flying car with head movement (until the missus distracts you - look over there... crash)

about people using it in the car (whilst driving)

Is it also going to have stupidly-bright flashing blue lights, just to point out to anyone who hadn't already noticed what a dork the wearer is?

The reason that the viewfinder is so big is because in order for the eye to be able to focus on a screen that close, and create the illusion of a 15" screen some optics are required between the eye and the display, which most likely is a camcorder viewfinder

1. Windows CE--Big difference. Plenty of embedded systems have used WinCE without a hitch for years.

2. The display--That's because of the magnifying lens. How else would you make a virtual 15" display with something the size of a couple sugar cubes? And Virtual Retinal Displays are still in the prototype stage.

3. Maybe not in the great outdoors, but business and market settings might consider the specced look rather chic (a man who keeps an eye on his business, so to speak).

4. Functionality--Think heads-up display for whatever task you're doing--driving, transacting, whatever. I'm sure people will find a use for it somehow.

There has been plenty of experimentation in Augmented Reality, and this would play right into those concepts.

No worries, it's too dorky for anybody to take seriously.

-dZ.

Many moons ago I had to do a project for Computing at school & had to investigate the future of computers.

I did a bit about wearable computers and one of the things I discovered was a laser which would draw the 'screen' directly on your retina.

It's been over 10 years since I did that- the screen on this thing just looks like a tiny LCD which sits in the centre of your field of view. Why haven't they perfected beaming the image into my eye already?

Come on boffins , pull the finger out.

... as seamlessly and as smoothly as a Blakes 7 set.

(But won't look as good)

Glad to see that they don't call them just "Hosts" or "People", that would seem to give them an identity.

I for one salute our new Windows CE running Overlords!

Well that's certainly one way to go about your daily work looking like a complete bloody cock.

Fnaaarr fnnaaar.

Paris, well - use your imagination (or, come 2010, your handsfree computer)

Does it come with a optional bucket for the inevitable chundering from motion sickness?

But really, how long before they dig someone wearing this out of the central reservation on the M25?

I can honestly say, I don't want one. If I was given one, I refuse to use it. I already look stupid enough, I don't need to look any foolish. For once, I don't care if it can run Linux or not.

I for one welcome our undead Belgian chop-socky overlords...

(BTW Random Noise, the problem is most likely safety when pointing a laser at an eye. It's theoretically possible, but to do it with 100% safety is going to be rather difficult.)

Resistance is fyoodul (I believe that's how they pronounce "futile" in the cube)

Anyone else remember a 90's corporate promo video with their engineers wearing something veeeeery similar...?

Doubt it'll take off that hugely after the inevitable brain cancer claims from wearing something on your head.

Small, wireless, decent resolution – that makes a good wearable display in my book! This will be awesome for all kinds of engineers and mechanics who actually have to get their hands on stuff. Check live data while you work on some machine without looking away, hands free… nifty. Could run on something other than Windows though, purdy please.

The gargoyle tech from Snow Crash will be available.

Oh, please! 85g. Who are they kidding? My phone weighs 85g and that lot looks more like 850g of complete stupidity

Should have included at least a digi compass. *Then* it would be a proper AR toy and teh sexy would start to flow.

Hm, thinking of sexy, I can use this for pr0n and nobody will know? Score!

"...Since Golden-i is a head-mounted unit there’s little hope of it featuring, say, a 500GB SSD..."

Indeed, but you could use a Wi-Fi or UWB link to a computing/comms/storage unit that you slip into a jacket pocket.

Then you advance to wearing a backpack with bigger battery, satellite coms, flip-out head-tracking gesture-activated plasma guns, etc. (You see where I'm heading with this?). The next stage is a lightweight ablative armour suit so why aren't DARPA working on this?

This will have shown to be useful only for DAY TRADERS and IT GEEK people.

Possibly others as well that need to check up on security very frequently such as the Intensive Care Unit. Or the owner of a dog that just gave birth.

Hoepfully this will come preloaded with a few cool games.

Great iDea, but why not make it look something like this:

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c317/Yoshi1684/burton2a.jpg

unlikely to dig anyone of the central reservation on the M25 as it's basically one big car park for London... might give the drivers something to do whilst stuck in the Friday afternoon queues.

.......then retrieves golden-i from far side of room.

it's about as futuristic as...err... yesterday.

The display optics don't need to be that clunky- look at the Vuzix Wrap 920. All the display inside a pair of sunglasses.

Also, MONO sound? An overhead support-band? Also, the "dumb-terminal-on-your-head" idea sounds really nice- but wouldn't work in real life. Can you imagine using it on the train? "'kay, I'll just click this icon... hell, we're in a tunnel. *waits* Right, connection re-established. Oh, there's a rockface so I'm about to lose my signal--yup, there it goes"

Wifi's not just available for anyone wandering the streets of a city- certainly nowhere outside the city- while GPRS is too slow and 3G coverage too patchy. Not to mention the cost of wirelessly streaming it to you. Using it on a plane isn't possible at all. Using it in an office wouldn't be too bad- until you had more than a small handfull of them and ran out of wireless bandwidth.

It provides less functionality than a Laptop, is more likely to get nicked (unless they included a chinstrap) and is less stylish than me (and that's saying something).

Also, how would you interact with the standard Windows interface you've gone to so much trouble to stream? Waving about a Wiimote-style wand? lugging about a keyboard and mouse?

Wearables shouldn't be particularly visible when they're designed properly. They certainly shouldn't make you use the standard Windows desktop.

There've been over 15 years of people figuring out what makes a good HUD for people with limited input options and who require rapid responses in computer games. Over 50 years of increasingly ergonomic dashboard design in cars. Why can't wearables developers take notice? We want a GPS-tracked minimap at the bottom left and a couple of other widgets on-screen most of the time. Clock, compass, maybe an RSS feed aggregator and incoming text message/email history. Flashy widgets should disapper when you're driving, though a hookup to the diagnostics system could be useful.

It's going to be used for porn.

The Boys in Blue Screen Of Death.

How much more painful are meetings going to get - Expect to repeat everything at least 3 times coz some idiot from marketing, supposedly giving you requirements spends his time with this strapped to his head. It's bad enough just with laptops at the moment.

On someones head that would be quite a sight :)

They don't want the "glasses" approach because they want at least one eye free and clear--important in a business or personal interaction (think sales) setting. They also don't want to completely cover the eye--doing that increases the risk of disorientation and motion sickness. Doing it their way, the screen covers part of one eye and the other eye can still see forward--a sort-of KISS approach to having both displays visible to you.

As for interaction, it mentions Bluetooth. Think your cell phone (which you can interact by blind touch).

I can definitely see this useful to drivers who no longer need to glance to their instrument panels or GPS units to keep from getting lost while driving to unknown locations. You mentioned security and emergency personnel, which is good. I'm also thinking market traders and people who have to simultaneously use a computer and interact with people (like travel agents and face-to-face support people).

"Hm, thinking of sexy, I can use this for pr0n and nobody will know? Score!"

Well, depending on how good the pr0n is, people might notice at least something going on...

As they have been doing this sort of stuff for about 15 years.

Personally I always thought it was a bit of a niche market but it could get bigger. For service techs I thought it would be great if the thing had a camera to view the widget being serviced and overlay an exploded diagram of it in bits. A laser pointer of some kind would allow a remote support person to point out any specific thing that needed attention.

Regarding the direct write laser idea. The lasers in question would be designed so they could not generate a dangerous level of light. Howeve the only fully integrated mirror system I know of is by Texas Instruments and seems to going only into pocket size LCD projects (and possibly next years must have camer phone?)

Motorola being a US operation they're probably hoping DARPA want to militarise it in the hope their fat useless friendly-killing warriors will get a little better. If nothing else it should give Lewis something to write about when they do.

On the other hand with the right interface it could prove invaluable for someone with impaired movement. I'm thinking stroke victims or badly disabled people.

And the resolution on my eyes are going south about as fast.

Give it another 50 years and they can fit my dead body with one.

(Zombies with wearables; who said there were no new ideas in SF?)

First Industrial applications for hands-free computing and communications

Later Pro-sumer versions - sleeker, smaller, more stylish design in development now for i-Phone, Blackberry, N-95 users that also interface frequently with PCs, Servers, etc and are highly mobile. Golden-i can control up to 7 other devices, like you control applications on your PC desktop.

Golden-i may use Windows CE 6.0, but with natural voice it can control your company servers, you PC where ever it is sitting. Linked on to a PC, desktop or even aCRAY Computer with 4G wireless interface, Golden-i puts the full power and capabilities of these larger machines completely under the users control - while highly mobile !

By the way, Golden-i's 6-Axix solid state position sensor monitors real-time velocity and acceleration, so if your driving a vehicle once you pass say 3-5 MPH, the high resolution shuts down. The moment you slow down or stop the vehicle the full high resolution display automatically comes back. When your moving rapidly in a vehicle, Golden-i provides an enlarged simple to glance at one line text, with substantiall enhanced audio interface.

You can ask Golden-i questions and Golden-i can respond with audio speech of it's own. Smartest ,easiest to use GPS interface, Internet browsing, etc. you have ever used when your mobile or otherwise.

Golden-i is very - very light. None industrial use versions will 60 % smaller in volume.

Interesting comments - seems like reading initial comments about the practicality of the first automobiles, Bell's telephone or airplanes.

Attend a major conference where Golden-is are being demonstrated and try one out. Several thousand people already have - several thousand individuals have been very pleased . . .

Didn't IBM have a prototype wearable computer with a very similar headset about 10 years ago? A single eye piece designed to transmit the equivalent of a 15" screen into your eyeball.

What next, VR headsets? Bring back the 90s!

Sounds like you are all overly sensitive about wearing the item on or around your head and the form factor. Would you consider or comment about same technology packaged in a smaller handheld version? Checkout: www.myWiPC.com Now will you complain from the other side it is not hands free!

Sounds like you are all overly sensitive about wearing the item on or around your head and the form factor. Would you consider or comment about same technology packaged in a smaller handheld version? Checkout: www.myWiPC.com Now will you complain from the other side it is not hands free!