By Chris 19Posted Wednesday 23rd September 2009 11:42 GMT
Intel's definition of "supporting features" is wildly different from the rest of the industry. A lot of "features" "supported" in their current GPUs are actually supported by the driver, but not by the actual hardware. I.e. if you use one of the "supported features", your graphics get drawn on the CPU.
Perhaps their DX10 support means DX9 at last, with DX 10 stuff emulated?
Comments on: Intel pledges 'big leap' in integrated graphics performance
Current standards of Open GL support? Doubtful. #
By tempemeaty Posted Wednesday 23rd September 2009 07:41 GMT
I'll believe it when i've actually tried it #
By Chris 19 Posted Wednesday 23rd September 2009 11:42 GMT
Why are intel naming their chips... #
By The elephant in the room Posted Wednesday 23rd September 2009 12:32 GMT
@The elephant in the room #
By Jeffrey Nonken Posted Wednesday 23rd September 2009 14:38 GMT
Intel makes graphics? Me thinks AMD fusion of ATI graphics will make it look bad... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 23rd September 2009 15:37 GMT
Intel CPU, ATI IGP #
By Al Jones Posted Wednesday 23rd September 2009 16:46 GMT