By Lou GosselinPosted Thursday 15th October 2009 15:21 GMT
The boxes are much more useful with root access.
http://buffalo.nas-central.org/wiki/Main_Page
I use one to run callweaver (asterisk fork), apache2, ssh, mysql, openvpn, samba, gcc, perl, etc.
Yes compiling is slow, but it has no problem hosting web pages, say, for an image gallery. For VPN, this device was not the bottleneck with my ISP.
The original PPC models were ~3X faster than the newer ARM9 variants computationally. Many operations were annoyingly slow (always waiting for aptitude to come up). However the ARM9 cpus, at 400mhz, are still better than some of the popular hacked embedded devices such as the NSLU.
By John LathamPosted Thursday 15th October 2009 19:15 GMT
Who wants a NAS without redundancy? Not me.
Just set up a ReadyNAS Duo with 1TB mirrored hotswap disks. Easy peasy setup and cheap enough (€240+VAT all in). The ReadyNAS includes Firefly which does a great job streaming both AAC and WMA to Songbird clients, but won't serve WMAs to iTunes for whatever reason.
I too have a ReadyNAS Duo, though only with 2x500GB. Still it does CIFS, AFP, NFS, FTP, HTTP, DLNA streaming (to PS3 in my case) and even rsync! Plus once rooted you can SSH on, and I've also thrown on Transmission as my torrent client of choice. Pretty easy to use and I've made tweaks to make sure that it only torrents between midnight and 8am when I don't get monitored for bandwidth usage. All in all, I'm extremely happy with it.
Comments on: Buffalo Linkstation Pro
After reading what you wrote... #
By Georgees Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 14:51 GMT
anything like old web interface? #
By Citizen Kaned Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 14:53 GMT
NFS #
By Graham Dresch Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 15:05 GMT
OpenLink/FreeLink #
By Lou Gosselin Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 15:21 GMT
Not for techs? #
By A Gould Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 15:45 GMT
DLNA , don't make me laugh #
By andrew mulcock Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 17:17 GMT
Mistake? #
By Aaron 10 Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 18:17 GMT
No mention of RAID #
By John Latham Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 19:15 GMT
Seagate inside? #
By Simon Ward Posted Friday 16th October 2009 10:21 GMT
@No mention of RAID #
By Jay 2 Posted Friday 16th October 2009 13:34 GMT
Nothing so elusive as perfection #
By unitron Posted Friday 16th October 2009 13:46 GMT