By SmallYellowFuzzyDuck, how pweety!Posted Friday 6th November 2009 16:41 GMT
Most drivers have trouble keeping to one per lane. That's going to be a scary sight, but I think it's just a sales gimmick that will never take off.
So the government continues to throw buckets of money at anything that can be considered remotely "Green"
Of course the finished product will be so expensive that no one will want to buy it.
Yeah I'm being cynical.
The first thing this goverment needs to do is encourage everyone to use public more often, but first they need to throw money at that to make it more desirable...
One day the whole country will just grind to a halt with traffic (Nearly there already) maybe roller skates will become popular again.
By Frank BoughPosted Friday 6th November 2009 17:16 GMT
... is the designer's assumption that, somehow, children need less space in a car than adults. It used to be true, until massive car seats became mandatory. Anyway, this thing is no more space efficient than the Mitsubishi iCar /iMiev upon whose engine it's based...
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 6th November 2009 17:28 GMT
"the help of £4.5m ($7.4m/€5m) investment from the British Government's Technology Strategy Board".
So it is an 'investment' - I wonder what rate of return we, the tax payer, can look forward to for our 'investment'? Probably 0% or less, so lets call it what it is - subsidising private 'enterprise'
Not exactly hard to design, but it's not going to ever be appropriate in mixed traffic with larger vehicles, and no matter how much people want it, there are still going to be huge vehicles on the road - even if it's just industrial/commercial. This will not take off
By Mike FlugennockPosted Friday 6th November 2009 19:23 GMT
Far be it from me to second-guess a guy who designs McLaren F1s, but, still... that seating arrangement looks real goddamn' uncomfortable -- like a lot of mini-cars or pseudo-sportscars which claim to seat four, but only if your backseat passengers happen to be midgets.
Seriously, if these sketches are anything to go by, I've seen more backseat room in a goddamn' '72 Beetle. Oh, and I've seen future-car concepts that propose one-in-front, two-in-back seating going back to about the early 1940s, and it looked uncomfortable back then, too.
By Al fazedPosted Saturday 7th November 2009 09:39 GMT
£4.5 million to develop a three seater with no space for shopping !
Where are these 3 little green people going in their eco car ?
The same old landfill as before I'll bet.
Not so good really.
Electric vehicles simply move the emmissions shit from where they are driven to the place where battery is manufactured and the places where it's 'orrible heavy metal contents comes from.
What a bunch of technophantic twats.
The only green wankers around here are still the same wankers.
By Giles JonesPosted Saturday 7th November 2009 10:12 GMT
>but it's not going to ever be appropriate in mixed traffic with larger vehicles
Simple, eco car lanes.
The torque from an electric motor beats many combustion engines. If you don't phase in the power gradually to the drive shaft then it would shear it off.
By Andrew 22Posted Sunday 8th November 2009 04:27 GMT
Is this a precursor to the starting grid for F1 2011 me wonders? Are we soon to witness Louis Hamilton and Ruebens Barichello line up with Ernie's milk float?
The only problem with this idea might be longetivity. The proposed milk float has a range of 100 miles, and yet the typical F1 race has a distance of some 250 miles start to finish. So is Eccleston et al going to allow the massive sun panels that will be required to keep the car on the distance? Or will there be new pitstop regulations to allow drivers to change their horses midway thru the race?
Paris because for some reason I was thinking of mounting a horse when writing the above.
By tomjolPosted Sunday 8th November 2009 18:01 GMT
Does anyone want to drive something half as wide as their current car? Really? Do you fancy getting two adults in the back in something half as wide as your current car?
Comments on: Legendary McLaren F1 designer talks up e-car plan
Two per lane!? #
By Matt Bucknall Posted Friday 6th November 2009 15:11 GMT
Source #
By Tim Spence Posted Friday 6th November 2009 15:29 GMT
I'm sure it's great #
By Flugal Posted Friday 6th November 2009 15:55 GMT
A better idea #
By CC Posted Friday 6th November 2009 16:15 GMT
So just to be clear... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 6th November 2009 16:18 GMT
Two per lane? Eek! #
By SmallYellowFuzzyDuck, how pweety! Posted Friday 6th November 2009 16:41 GMT
Gordon Murray.... #
By Brian Morrison Posted Friday 6th November 2009 16:46 GMT
Innovation my a*se #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 6th November 2009 16:55 GMT
One big mistake #
By Frank Bough Posted Friday 6th November 2009 17:16 GMT
Investment, my arse #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 6th November 2009 17:28 GMT
Tiny death traps on wheels #
By Piro Posted Friday 6th November 2009 18:18 GMT
@Source #
By Richard 102 Posted Friday 6th November 2009 18:20 GMT
Don't know about the seating #
By Mike Flugennock Posted Friday 6th November 2009 19:23 GMT
I want a Russian one #
By John 62 Posted Saturday 7th November 2009 01:32 GMT
F1 off #
By Al fazed Posted Saturday 7th November 2009 09:39 GMT
@Tiny death traps on wheels #
By Giles Jones Posted Saturday 7th November 2009 10:12 GMT
seen it before #
By MPT Posted Saturday 7th November 2009 10:22 GMT
i #
By Lee Shields Posted Saturday 7th November 2009 13:32 GMT
Formula 1 2011 #
By Andrew 22 Posted Sunday 8th November 2009 04:27 GMT
Half the width... #
By tomjol Posted Sunday 8th November 2009 18:01 GMT
Standards #
By Dennis Healey Posted Sunday 8th November 2009 19:13 GMT
no more iStuff please. #
By Andy 70 Posted Monday 9th November 2009 10:39 GMT